See the research questions and implementation work that remain open.
Demonstration checks and formal engine acceptance are separate evaluations. Passing local reporting tests does not establish overall readiness or engine effectiveness.
End-to-end readiness remains under evaluation, including startup, repeated runs, shutdown and failure recovery. The combined reporting interface is unfinished. An earlier unexplained startup failure remains unresolved in the documented evidence.
The recipient is a cooperating CLI. Browser forwarding and strip-before-browser behavior are unimplemented. Local peer checks do not prove original producer identity or general intermediary behavior. There is no full Structured Fields conformance claim.
Independent correctness, the benefit of historical context and the runtime OODA loop remain open research questions. Evaluation on previously unseen cases and an updated formal acceptance record are still needed.
The demonstration separates three responsibilities: the application authorizes access, the C engine assesses completed evidence in a separate scene, and an optional reporting experiment communicates an advisory selection to a technical recipient. The documented results cover these bounded scenarios; they do not establish additional defensive benefit from the engine.